PDF/EPUB The Happy Stripper Pleasures and Politics of the New ↠ construyamos.co ↠

If the burlesue stripper with her bawdy spirit and unruly insubordination has emerged for many as a new 'empowering' model for the sexually aware woman then she also strikes horror in the heard of second wave feminism Embodied by high profile artists such as Dita von Teese and Catherine d'Lish the explosive revival of striptease burlesue and overt female sexual performance has proved no less alluring to a new generation women artists familiar with the provocative work of 70's performance artists such as Hannah Wikle and Carolee Schneeman Elouent on 'prettiness' and power desire and 'knowingness' money sex and class and with an extensive knowledge of burlesue's rich tradition Wilson raises long overdue uestions about women's erotic expression within a 'postfeminist' condition The 'new burlesue' demands about all a response this fresh brazen provocative book at last provides it

10 thoughts on “The Happy Stripper Pleasures and Politics of the New Burlesque

  1. says:

    It really really feels like Jacki Willson saw one burlesque show googled a bit and then decided to write a book on the top three search results and label it as new burlesque She focuses on Dita Von Teese as the queen of burlesque and occasionally mentions other modern burlesquers such as Immodesty Blaize and then claims they are representative of all burlesque It really really feels like she only experienced burlesque once and did the rest of her research online Maybe this wasn't her intention but it's definitely how it readsMaaaybe half of the book talks about burlesque The rest is admittedly interesting an overview of the history of feminism and feminist performance art and some random loosely related sections about hijabs and veiling She then sort of connects these things with burlesque mostly repeating information from other sources She concludes each section with a series of provocative and compelling questions which she never answersDita Von Teese may be the queen of burlesque but Willson doesn't clearly note the difference between mainstream and underground burlesque While there is no widely accepted distinction between the two plenty of researchers and performers too recognize that there are two large forms of modern burlesque Dita represents a certain type of burlesque while the majority of underground neo burlesque has very little in common with her Many of the critiques and questions Willson brings up are in fact answered and confronted in a number of neo burlesque troupesWillson says that her impetus for this book was encountering a burlesque performance who happened to be a lesbian but the book almost exclusively focuses on heterosexual cisgender female performers not even exclusively burlesque performers She claims this is because there is already a prolific amount of research on femininity and lesbianism I don't doubt this However I can speak from personal experience that there is a huge lack of research on queer burlesque a bizarre lack considering that a large number of modern burlesque performers are queer as demonstrated by Willson's own experience Willson continues to focus on the male gaze even after admitting that the majority of neo burlesque audiences are female and only discusses performers again only a fraction of what she talks about is even burlesque as heterosexual cisgender women She does not take into account male burlesque performers or performers who exist outside of or in between the binaryMaybe I'm being too picky Obviously one book cannot discuss every single aspect of burlesque But I was extremely disappointed with this book because it didn't live up to its title MAYBE a third of the book focused on burlesque and all of those sections were essentially paraphrasings of other sources with little to no new input The title implies that the focus is New Burlesque but in reality the focus is Dita Von Teese and a series of feminist performance artists not burlesquersEssentially the book has no real focus There are too many elements that are not clearly linked together and not thoroughly explored If this were not titled as a book on burlesque I would be less harsh on it But it's in the title

  2. says:

    Read for my Master's dissertation discussing burlesque feminism and empowerment I would have left this book unrated but feels weird doing that so 3 stars standardI enjoyed this book It had a lot of interesting points and a lot of points I disagreed with It will be a great resource for my research project I've written something of a full review for my literature review but it's currently a very messy draft that I don't want to look at

  3. says:

    I think by providing all the evidence including some the reader didn't need hurt Willson's arguement For example she started to talk about the Iraq war and women's rights there and how it comparted to the West but then just left it I thought that her arguement would lead me in one direction just to have it stopped abruptly and go in another the best example is the Middle Eastern rights I thoght that she should have tied everything together instead of jumping around so much

  4. says:

    I thought this was going to be a book on burlesque but it turned out to be so much Willson looks at periods in time when burlesque was most popular as they coincided with times of great change and unrest in western society She also tackles the question of whether burlesque performers are feminists or pandering to the patriarchy Some really good argumentsopinions in this book that will have me pondering long after reading

  5. says:

    Fantastic book looking at burlesque and feminism in a critical wayInteresting perspectives a necessary for anyone interested in the burlesque feminist or not? debate

  6. says:

    Excellent 'starter' read on the politics and development of Burlesque

  7. says:

    I’m in this one too

  8. says:

    7927 W68H